“Market Urbanism is the intersection of urban issues and free market philosophy.”

We interview Scott Beyer of the Market Urbanism Report to introduce the ideas of Market Urbanism and discuss a broad sweep of issues in housing, transportation, and governance.

Use hashtag #ana030 to reference this episode in a tweet, post, or comment

View full show notes at https://anarchitecturepodcast.com/ana030.

Intro

  • Contrition
  • Joe’s urbanism crash course
  • Tim met some OG Market Urbanists
  • Scott Beyer and the Market Urbanism Report
  • Demystifying urbanist jargon
  • Market Urbanists are down in the trenches
  • We are explicitly ideological, Scott is more pragmatic
  • Urban issues have a natural affinity for libertarian solutions – becuase they work
  • Three broad categories – Housing, Transportation, and Governance
  • The Anarchitecture Podcast All-Star Game (details in links below)

Discussion

  • What is Market Urbanism?
    • Cross between free-market policy and urban issues
    • Theory – how would decentralized private cities work?
    • Practical set of policy reforms
    • Market oriented reforms
  • How did Scott get interested in these ideas?
    • Living in cities, interested in urban issues
    • Why are projects hard to get approved?
    • Why do downtowns empty out at 5PM?
    • Research led to more libertarian understanding
    • Influential writers
      • MarketUrbanism.com
      • Jane Jacobs
      • Ed Glaeser
  • We see urbanism as a conduit to bring libertarian / free market ideas to a broader audience
    • People think of cities as complex infrastructure managed by big government
    • A more granular look is more libertarian – the “Street Ballet” of voluntary exchange
    • “When cities follow that libertarian impulse, they do really well.”
    • Nobody has planned the allocation of specific businesses and residences
  • Housing
    • Market Urbanism approach – a free-flowing, unregulated, market-oriented process
    • Theory – How would cities develop under a free market?
    • Practical – specific problems and policies in cities
    • Restrictive Zoning
      • Single Family Zoning in hot markets
      • San Francisco – around 75% zoned for single family or duplex
      • “The city cannot change.”
      • Setback Requirements
      • Lot Coverage Requirements
      • Parking Minimums
      • Density Requirements
      • Minimum Lot Size – an historic 6-unit building restricted to 2 units
    • Counterintuitive zoning – do the planning boards even understand these impacts?
      • The empty husk – 8-story building limited to 12 units means the units will be large and unaffordable
      • No, they don’t understand
    • What has motivated zoning requirements?
      • Early 20th century; cities grew using a combination of private deed restrictions and municipal zoning
      • Racism and classism – “they thought that was a good thing!”
      • Separating industry from housing
      • Euclid v. Amber – “Euclidean Zoning”
      • Late 20th century; more subjective and aesthetic, more complex
    • Do cities have a responsibility to preserve property values?
      • No – zoning should not be a protection for special interests
      • The irony – absent the regulations, property values would increase
      • MUH CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD
      • If a potential buyer can subdivide my lot, that increases my property value – capturing the location value twice
    • Policy success – “by-right” incremental development allowed in some states
    • ADU – Accessory Dwelling Unit; an additional unit on a single family property
      • Attached: basement apartment
      • Detached: backyard cottage, granny flat
      • “We won’t build proper housing for the Millenials, but we’ll put them in the basement.”
      • ADU – a fiction created by zoning ordinances – the state taketh, then giveth back but a mere morsel
      • It’s better than nothing, but we need new housing
    • Filtering
      • The more new houses you build, the cheaper old houses become (in elastic markets)
    • Gentrification
      • Less than 10% of people get displaced, and relocate to a similar quality neighborhood (see links below)
      • Existing owners tend to benefit from positive externalities
      • Middle ground – allow the new developments, give housing vouchers
      • You can’t prevent neighborhoods from changing
    • Inclusionary Zoning (IZ) – “Rent Control 2.0”
      • Allow developers to build to a certain level if they allocate a percentage of “Affordable” units
      • IZ tends to reduce the overall supply of housing by making projects less feasible
  • Transportation
    • Theory – Can a market provide sufficient transit efficiency?
    • Examples of privatizated transport
      • Mexico City – Paseros – “The Uber of Driving!”
      • Uber – The Paseros of America
    • “Who will build the roads?”
      • Alain Bertaud – Order Without Design – Does the government need to build key infrastructure?
      • Right-of-ways in developed places
      • Brightline High Speed Rail (HSR) – Miami to Fort Lauderdale
      • Proposed bullet trains hitting right of way issues
      • Acela train – slows down through every Connecticut NIMBY town
      • Trade-offs between nuisances and benefits
      • Direct negotiations vs. government mediated negotiations
      • Coase Theorem – if you want to obstruct development, you need to pay for that right
      • Pigouvian tax
      • Mitigation rather than obstruction
      • If you live in NYC, you should expect tall buildings around you
      • High speed rail can increase property values – sell it for a windfall and move away from the nuisance
    • Transit Oriented Development (TOD)
      • Value capture – train companies own and develop surrounding land plots to fund the rail
      • In USA, regulatory hurdles prevent TOD
      • For state owned transit agencies, there is no profit motive to develop
    • How do you manage a complex street grid?
      • Pricing different uses; NO FREE PARKING
      • Bus operators could out-bid cars for street space
      • Privatizing public space
      • Market pricing for street space could entice further investment
    • Pricing sidewalks and curb space
      • Buses and bike share could carve out their spaces
      • Scattered scooters – tragedy of the commons
      • Prohibition and monopoly contracts for scooters
    • There is no free parking
      • No market incentive to build a small commercial garage
      • Charge market rates for on-street parking
      • Balancing the interest of local business owners – “We’ll see how valuable it is to him”
      • In urban contexts, most customers aren’t driving to your store
      • Increasing the cost of parking makes other transit options more attractive
      • “Drivers in Boston are jerks, but drivers in Manhattan are just insane”
      • The less space you allocate to parking, the more space you have for street beautification
    • Car-free streets
      • Social distancing promotes outdoor seating
      • “Let the market work; let the consumer decide”
  • City Governance
    • City services shouldn’t be government-run
    • Charter Schools
    • Privatizing (or “divesting”, or “DESTATALIZING”) public space
    • Value Capture
    • Land Value Tax – recoup value of improvements for reinvestment
    • Government provision – no pricing feedback loops
    • User Fees – direct market feedback
    • Tax Increment Financing (TIF) – tax on incremental value of a specific amenity
    • What about people who can’t afford fees?
      • Guaranteed minimum income
      • Voucher model – rather than funding an MTA, give people transit vouchers and let the market determine transit modalities
      • Let wealth redistribution be a separate, more efficient system
      • Neoliberalism – “Fund People, not Beauraucracy”
      • Obstacles are political – vested interests, patronage mills
  • What impact is Market Urbanism having?
    • It’s more in the “ideas” stage
    • YIMBY movement pushing similar message
    • Strong Towns movement
    • Congress for New Urbanism (CNU)
    • Anarchitecture
    • State level bills to make housing legal by-right
    • We’ve seen a good response among libertarians

Links/Resources

Episodes Mentioned

Support Anarchitecture Podcast on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

Contact:

Contact Us
Tweet us: @anarchitecturep

Follow:

Website: https://www.anarchitecturepodcast.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/anarchitecturepodcast/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/anarchitecturep/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/anarchitecturep/
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/AnarchitecturePodcst
Minds: https://www.minds.com/AnarchitecturePodcast

Subscribe:

iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/au/podcast/anarchitecture/id1091252412
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWELM_zTl7tXLgT-rDKpSvg
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5pepyQfA25PBz6bzKzlynf?si=4UiD6cLkR6Wd26wJC4S4YQ
Podbean: https://anarchitecture.podbean.com/
Stitcher: http://www.stitcher.com/s?fid=85082&refid=stpr
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/MIq2dOnSaTOP/
RSS (all posts): https://www.anarchitecturepodcast.com/feed/
RSS (Podcasts only): https://www.anarchitecturepodcast.com/feed/podcast/
Other Subscription Options

Support:

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/anarchitecturepodcast
Bitbacker.io: https://bitbacker.io/user/anarchitecture/
Steemit: https://steemit.com/@anarchitecture
Donate Bitcoin (BTC): 32cPbM7j5rxRu1KUaXGtoxsqFQNWD696p7